Bluehost vs. FatCow: Price Analysis
Comparing introductory prices for basic shared hosting, FatCow often emerges as the cheaper option.
This is primarily due to FatCow's historical strategy of offering very low promotional rates for its simple, all-in-one shared hosting plan or minimal entry-level packages. Bluehost also provides competitive introductory pricing on its tiered plans, but FatCow's simplest offers can undercut these for users seeking the absolute lowest initial outlay.
Crucial Considerations Beyond Initial Price:
- Renewal Costs: Both providers have significantly higher renewal rates after the initial term. These must be factored in for long-term cost assessment.
- Feature Value: Bluehost generally offers a wider array of plans with more features and scalability. A slightly more expensive Bluehost plan might offer better overall value if its features align with your needs.
- Plan Specifics: The "cheaper" provider ultimately depends on the specific plan's resources and the duration of the hosting agreement.
In summary, for the lowest upfront cost on very basic hosting, FatCow frequently has the edge. For overall value considering features and potential growth, a detailed comparison including renewal rates is necessary.
